The 21st Century and Brain Development

BrainDevelopmentIt is easy to denigrate traditional teaching techniques in our high tech world where all of the talk is focused on the global economy and 21st century learning skills. When we can set up video conferences with students from the other side of the world, people wonder why we would spend our time on multiplication tables or on reading novels written decades ago. We make the assumption that some of the vestiges of our schooling memories will not cut it in the 21st century classroom where skills such as critical thinking, problem solving, cooperative learning and the ability to empathize with different cultures and people, are stressed. While education must change to adjust to the new demands of our changing world, some skills are timeless and excellent educators have been stressing them for years. Current research is also showing that some mundane practices, such as rudimentary math calculations, may engage more of the brain than complex video games. It is also showing that sustained concentration on a difficult task allows us the ability to focus and problem solve better than does flittering from task-to-task.

The brain is still a largely undiscovered country. Scientists are only beginning to unlock the secrets of how our brains function and develop. Recent research is showing, however, that certain activities can stimulate the brain to grow and prosper, very much like exercise can help our muscles to develop. We are also learning that sustained reading, solving math equations and stimulating conversation can be much more effective for the development of brain “fitness” than other 21st century activities.

The implications for educators are interesting. We must be certain to use the traditional, somewhat more mundane practices when they will help to develop the brain and mental fitness. This might not always be a popular or entertaining choice, but it is one that will benefit the student in the long run. We must also interject the 21st century applications to stimulate higher order thinking and problem solving skills.

My high school history teacher liked to remind us that the only constant in history is change. The trick for educators is embracing the changes that are beneficial because not all change is for the better. We also need to maintain those practices, no matter how difficult they may seem, that develop the fundamental skills needed to allow higher order thought and expression. This is not an easy task. At Lower Canada College professional development, the sharing of ideas and discussions about current research are key elements of our culture. It is only through life-long learning that we can assure that we are keeping the intellectual needs of our students at the forefront. —Patrick Peotto, Assistant Head – Academics

Decade Dialectics

Every January I struggle with the change of year—and in a very practical way. It takes me a while to adapt to the change from the previous year. I have already made a lot of mistakes and wasted a lot of cheques and have written “2009” on several notepads and documents wherever I needed the date. This year has been especially difficult for me as we have not simply jumped another digit, but moved to 2010—the end of the decade.

blogEnd of decades bring on some curious developments. Think about it, music is constantly referred to by the decade. There are entire stations on satellite and local radio dedicated to 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s classics. Social trends are also attributed to specific decades. We like to classify things this way; hippies and the rise of feminism during the 60s is a perfect example of this tendency. A decade reflects a neat and tidy period, and analysts like to compartmentalize specific trends, developments and orientations.

textingThis past weekend I read about a conference of language experts in the USA who gathered to determine the most important new words from the past decade. The sponsoring organization is called the American Dialect Society and is composed of leading linguists, writers and independent scholars. Yes, language does evolve and change. In fact through teenagers’ current addiction to texting at an extraordinary rate, young people are actually influencing the English language more dramatically and more rapidly than at any time in history, especially when it comes to the use of new abbreviations for words.

Consider for a moment the conference on new words. Can you think of what some of the most popular new words were from the past ten years that crept into common use? Finalists included words we have all incorporated into our vocabularies, but actually didn’t exist a decade ago. They include: “green” – in terms of the green movement for protecting our environment and the greening of buildings, institutions and companies. The terms “9/11” and “War on Terror” became common after the attacks on the twin towers in New York in 2001. Two others referred to popular activities driven by technology: to “blog,” and to “text.” Amazingly, no one did it only a decade ago, so those words were finalists. The big winner was the verb “To google”……with millions of searches on that particular search engine reflecting the biggest societal change from a decade ago.

So America’s foremost language experts have reminded us that three main developments in the past decade are particularly notable: (1) the growth of the environmental movement; (2) the aftermath of 9/11 and the birth of a new extremism (especially since the end of the Cold War between the USA & the USSR); and (3) the impact of rapidly-changing technology in the information age.

To google is to find answers almost instantly on virtually any topic. It’s fantastic, really, but I offer two warnings. Is googling making us lazy and impatient? In many ways I think so. We are so used to instant responses to our searches, what’s the impact on the other areas of our lives where the answers aren’t as instant, where we need to invest time, be thoughtful and show patience. I think the rush is a problem and we need to admit it and take steps to counter what could be the decade of impatience in the next ten years. Second, don’t be duped by the first answers you receive when you search online. The best information may be layers below the top pages of a Google search – those that rise to the top often pay for that privilege. It’s how Google makes such an obscene profit every year. It may not always be the best information for your purposes.

So what will be the new words that define new trends and developments a decade from today? If neither you nor I are here, just text me to offer your selections….. if text still exists. I doubt it will. Ten years from now it will probably be seen as ancient technology —so passé, so yesterday! —Christopher Shannon, Headmaster

Problem of the Week: LCC Turns 100

Grade1Centenary_07Dec2009Every week, LCC’s grade 1 students receive a “Math Problem of the Week,” which is made up of several math activities that they need to solve.

In honour of LCC’s 100th birthday celebration, the grade 1 students put together their own display of 100 objects. They needed to choose 100 items, count them by putting them into groups and present them in any way they wanted. The results were amazing! Their projects were creative, vibrant and original. Our founder, Dr. Fosbery, would be proud… I sure am!

—Miss Wehlan

Quotes from students:

“I learned how to group by tens. I liked putting the items in colour and shape order.” — Grayson Velan, 1A

“I liked subtracting the extra objects from 100.” — Isabella Taite, 1A

I liked to work with counting.”. — Natalie Clack, 1A

“I learned how to group by 5s.” — Harry Wiltzer, 1A

“My favourite part was presenting. I learned how to count to 100.” — Devon LLano, 1B

“I learned how to group numbers.” — Lily Trestan, 1B

“I know that 10 x 10 is 100.” — Alexander Chneerov, 1B

“I think all of the projects were super!” — Sophie Rioux, 1B

Critique 20 000 lieues sous les mers

20000J’ai beaucoup apprécié le spectacle 20 000 lieues sous les mers. Premièrement, j’ai trouvé que les acteurs ont joué leur rôle d’une façon animée ce qui a stimulé l’audience. Aussi, les effets spéciaux (le son, la lumière) étaient excellents pour une pièce de théâtre. Ils ont contribué grandement à la qualité du spectacle. Cependant, à certains moments, les acteurs parlaient très vite, et c’était difficile de les comprendre. Malgré cela, 20,000 lieues sous les mers était une pièce de théâtre que j’ai trouvé très bien faite en plusieurs aspects.

Jon Victor (8è année accélérée)
——————————————————————————————–

La pièce de théâtre qu’on a vu : 20 000 lieux sous les mers était très intéressante à regarder. Il y avait beaucoup d’effets spéciaux, mon préféré était celui de la bibliothèque. C’était une illusion d’optique où on pensait que la bibliothèque était en 3D, c’était très amusant de regarder cette partie. Je pense aussi que les acteurs étaient très bons et qu’il y avait beaucoup d’humour dans la pièce. Mon personnage préféré était l’homme canadien car il était très bon dans son rôle. Chaque scène était tellement bien planifiée, mais la fin était un peu confuse. L’histoire qu’il a essayé de mettre en scène était très difficile à faire, alors je pense que c’était très bien fait.

Alissar Karam (8è année accélérée)
———————————————————————————————————-
Voyez ce que la nature peut offrir lorsque l’homme y est absent. On dit souvent d’un monde vierge,qu’il est sauvage, mais (…) qui est le plus sauvage ? L’homme ou la nature ? –– Capitaine Nemo

J’ai beaucoup apprécié le roman et j’ai été impressionné par la pièce. Comment reproduire l’atmosphère d’un sous-marin dans une salle de théâtre ? Comment faire participer les spectateurs ? Comment avoir le mal de mer en étant confortablement assis dans un fauteuil du théâtre Denise-Pelletier ? Voici quelques questions que je me posais avant d’aller voir la pièce. Grâce à une ellipse métallique suspendue au milieu de la scène, Jean-Guy Legault nous fait naviguer dans différents univers. Aidé d’animations visuelles sur grands écrans (un devant, un derrière) et d’effets sonores hors du commun, ces 20 000 lieues sous les mers ne m’ont pas paru durer les deux heures du spectacle.

–JF Maurice